skip to main content
article

Board Games and Board Game Design as Learning Tools for Complex Scientific Concepts: Some Experiences

Published:01 April 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this paper the authors report different experiences in the use of board games as learning tools for complex and abstract scientific concepts such as Quantum Mechanics, Relativity or nano-biotechnologies. In particular we describe “Quantum Race”, designed for the introduction of Quantum Mechanical principles, “Lab on a chip”, concerning the immune system and the nano-biotechnologies, “Time Race”, created to explain Relativistic concepts such as time dilation. The main idea is to choose a core of few basic concepts to be explained, and to design the game mechanisms and rules completely around them. Each game has been played by about 1000 participants, mainly students, with excellent results concerning growth of interest and comprehension on the considered themes. In a second phase (still in progress) the authors are considering the possibility to use the direct engagement of learners in the creation of games of this kind as a learning tool for scientific subjects, in particular for light and photonics. They present in detail these activities with obtained and expected results and issues.

References

  1. Agliari, E., & Biselli, E., DeNinno, A., Schiavoni, G., Gabriele, L., Gerardino, A., & Businaro, L. et al. (2014). Cancer-driven dynamics of immune cells in a microfluidic environment. Scientific Reports, 4, 6639. doi:10.1038/srep06639 PMID:25322144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Announcement of the Archimede Prize competition. (2016). Archimede Prize. Retrieved from http://www.studiogiochi.com/en/p/premio-archimede.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books. doi:10.1215/9780822388128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Berland, M., & Lee, V. R. (2011). Collaborative Strategic Board Games as a Site for Distributed Computational Thinking. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 1(2), 65–81. doi:10.4018/ijgbl.2011040105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bright, G. W., Harvey, J. G., & Wheeler, M. M. (1983). Use of a Game to Instruct on Logical Reasoning. School Science and Mathematics, 83(5), 396–406. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1983.tb15526.x.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Businaro, L., De Ninno, A., Schiavoni, G., Lucarini, V., Ciasca, G., Gerardino, A., & Mattei, F. et al. (2013). Cross talk between cancer and immune cells: Exploring complex dynamics in a microfluidic environment . Lab on a Chip, 13(2), 229–239. doi:10.1039/C2LC40887B PMID:23108434.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society and culture. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiarello, F. (2014). L'officina del meccanico quantistico. Italy: Apogeo Educational.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chin, C. D., Linder, V., & Sia, S. K. (2007). Lab-on-a-chip devices for global health: Past studies and future opportunities. Lab on a Chip, 7(1), 41–57. doi:10.1039/B611455E PMID:17180204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Einstein, A. (1905). Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik., 17(10), 891–921. doi:10.1002/andp.19053221004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Einstein, A. (2001). Relativity: The Special and the General Theory. Classic Series. Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Feynman, R. (1965). The Character of Physical Law. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gee, J. P. (2007). Good video games and good learning: collected essays on video games learning, and literacy. New York, NY: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gilmore, R. (1995). Alice in the Quantumland. Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-3-322-85009-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gobet, F., De Voogt, A., & Retschitzki, J. (2004). Moves in Mind: The Psychology of Board games. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Juul, J. (2008). The Magic Circle and the Puzzle Piece. Proceedings of the conference on the Philosophy of Computer Games, 56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge 1 – Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practising’ in Improving Student Learning – Ten Years On. Oxford, UK: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (Eds.). (2006). Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. MontolaM. (2005). Exploring the edge of the magic circle: Defining pervasive games.Proceedings of DAC (Vol. 1966).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Muller, R., & Wiesner, H. (2002). Teaching quantum mechanics on an introductory level . American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 200. doi:10.1119/1.1435346.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Perkins, D. (1999). The Many Faces of Constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Perkins, D. (2010). Making learning whole: How seven principles of teaching can transform education. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Photonics4All. (2015). EU Project website, from http://photonics4all.euGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. New York, NY: Paragon House.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Sakurai, J. J., & Napolitano, J. (2011). Modern Quantum Mechanics. San Francisco, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Salen, K. (2008). The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and learning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Shanklin, S. B., & Ehlen, C. R. (2007). Using the Monopoly Board Game As An Efficient Tool In Introductory Financial Accounting Instruction. Journal of Business Case Studies, 3(3), 17–22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Treher, E. N. (2011). Learning with Board Games. The Learning Key Inc. Retrieved from http://www.destinagames.com/pdf/Board_Games_TLKWhitePaper_May16_2011r.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Walther, B. K. (2005). Molecular Experience: Theory of pervasive gaming. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) - . Theoretical and Practical Computer Applications in Entertainment, 3(3), 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wanderi, M. P. (2011). The indigenous games of the people of the coastal region of Kenya: a cultural and educational appraisal. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Organization for Social Science research in Eastern and Southern Africa (OSSREA).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Weinberg, S. (1972). Gravitation and cosmology: principles and applications of the general theory of relativity. Michigan, MI: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Whitton, N. (2010). Learning with digital games: a practical guide to engaging students in higher education. London, UK: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Whitton, N., & Moseley, A. (2012). Using games to enhance learning and teaching: a beginner's guide. New York, NY: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Yoon, B., Rodriguez, L., Faselis, C. J., & Liappis, A. P. (2014). Using a Board Game to Reinforce Learning. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(3), 110–111. doi:10.3928/00220124-20140224-14 PMID:24588236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Zimmerman, E. (2012). Jerked Around by the Magiuc Circle: Clearing the Air Ten Years Later. Gamasutra. Retrieved from http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/135063/jerked_around_by_the_magic_circle_.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Board Games and Board Game Design as Learning Tools for Complex Scientific Concepts: Some Experiences
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access